# fit coefficients (with more digits from fit.log) from Table 1 of Aoyama et al. (2021; http://ads.nao.ac.jp/abs/2021ApJ...917L..30A) and a few extra ones #name ni nf a b sig_a sig_b rms_of_residuals Lya 2 1 0.903333 0.425741 0.011520 0.07472 0.242437 Lyb 3 1 0.859247 0.828762 0.009543 0.06953 0.213451 Lyg 4 1 0.864767 1.16707 0.009373 0.07150 0.208659 Ha 3 2 0.948873 1.61227 0.005503 0.04083 0.114361 Hb 4 2 0.867728 1.46688 0.005089 0.04044 0.115619 Hg 5 2 0.846246 1.60383 0.005832 0.04846 0.135346 Hd 6 2 0.838106 1.76866 0.006253 0.05368 0.146176 H7 7 2 0.833061 1.91382 0.006483 0.05712 0.152262 H8 8 2 0.829488 2.04095 0.006599 0.05940 0.155542 H9 9 2 0.827184 2.15691 0.006654 0.06098 0.157197 # extra, not shown in the Letter H10 10 2 0.825622 2.26257 0.006679 0.06218 0.158060 # idem Paa 4 3 0.926230 2.49144 0.004589 0.03921 0.0979595 Pab 5 3 0.862607 2.20601 0.005457 0.04827 0.124515 Pag 6 3 0.845287 2.27519 0.006067 0.05526 0.140793 Pad 7 3 0.836619 2.38088 0.006387 0.05958 0.149463 Pa8 8 3 0.831327 2.48826 0.006544 0.06227 0.153946 Pa9 9 3 0.828225 2.59416 0.006620 0.06408 0.156246 # idem Pa10 10 3 0.826402 2.69604 0.006665 0.06547 0.157594 # idem Bra 5 4 0.937968 3.31813 0.004707 0.04385 0.0992085 Brb 6 4 0.872861 2.87830 0.005480 0.05210 0.123588 Brg 7 4 0.850971 2.84258 0.006043 0.05869 0.139362 Brd 8 4 0.839641 2.88458 0.006344 0.06276 0.147989 Br9 9 4 0.833404 2.95604 0.006492 0.06525 0.152412 # idem