!MOLECULE C+ (atomic ion) !MOLECULAR WEIGHT 12.0 !NUMBER OF ENERGY LEVELS 8 !LEVEL + ENERGIES(cm^-1) + WEIGHT + J 1 0.000000000 2.0 0.5 ! 2P^o 2 63.395087 4.0 1.5 ! 2P^o 3 43003.291 2.0 0.5 ! 4P 4 43025.285 4.0 1.5 ! 4P 5 43053.568 6.0 2.5 ! 4P 6 74930.074 6.0 2.5 ! 2D 7 74932.608 4.0 1.5 ! 2D 8 96493.727 2.0 0.5 ! 2S !NUMBER OF RADIATIVE TRANSITIONS 14 !TRANS + UP + LOW + EINSTEINA(s^-1) + FREQ(GHz) + E_u(K) 1 4 3 2.390E-07 659.364 61903.4 2 5 4 3.670E-07 847.903 61944.1 3 5 3 3.490E-14 1507.267 61944.1 4 2 1 2.300E-06 1900.5369 91.21 5 3 2 6.550E+01 1287305.7 61871.8 6 4 2 5.240E+00 1287965.1 61903.4 7 5 2 4.320E+01 1288813.0 61944.1 8 3 1 5.530E+01 1289206.2 61871.8 9 4 1 1.710E+00 1289865.6 61903.4 10 6 2 2.864E+08 2244476.5 107808.4 11 7 2 4.773E+07 2244522.5 107810.6 12 7 1 2.393E+08 2246423.1 107810.6 13 8 2 1.526E+09 2890908.6 138832.1 14 8 1 7.643E+08 2892809.2 138832.1 !NUMBER OF COLL PARTNERS 4 !PARTNER 1 COLLISIONS BETWEEN 2 C+ + pH2 ! thermal H2 J=0 and J=2, cf Wiesenfeld & Goldsmith 2014 !NUMBER OF COLL TRANS 1 !NUMBER OF COLL TEMPS 7 !COLL TEMPS 10.0 20.0 50.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 500.0 !TRANS + UP + LOW + COLLRATES(cm^3 s^-1) 1 2 1 4.36E-10 4.53E-10 4.63E-10 4.72E-10 5.13E-10 5.55E-10 6.01E-10 !PARTNER 2 COLLISIONS BETWEEN 3 C+ + oH2 ! Lique et al. (2013), Wiesenfeld & Goldsmith (2014) !NUMBER OF COLL TRANS 1 !NUMBER OF COLL TEMPS 7 !COLL TEMPS 10.0 20.0 50.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 500.0 !TRANS + UP + LOW + COLLRATES(cm^3 s^-1) 1 2 1 5.29E-10 5.33E-10 5.37E-10 5.45E-10 5.62E-10 5.71E-10 5.79E-10 !PARTNER 3 COLLISIONS BETWEEN 5 C+ + H ! Barinovs et al. 2005, ApJ, 620, 537 !NUMBER OF COLL TRANS 1 !NUMBER OF COLL TEMPS 14 !COLL TEMPS 20. 40. 60. 80. 100. 140. 200. 300. 400. 600. 800. 1000. 1500. 2000. !TRANS + UP + LOW + COLLRATES(cm^3 s^-1) 1 2 1 5.96e-10 6.79e-10 7.19e-10 7.42e-10 7.58e-10 7.84e-10 8.17e-10 8.63e-10 9.02e-10 9.67e-10 1.02e-9 1.066e-9 1.158e-9 1.231e-9 !PARTNER 4 COLLISIONS BETWEEN 4 C+ + e ! Wilson & Bell, 2002, MNRAS, 337, 1027 !NUMBER OF COLL TRANS 7 !NUMBER OF COLL TEMPS 9 !COLL TEMPS 10.0 20.0 50.0 100.0 316.2 1000.0 2000.0 10000. 20000. !TRANS + UP + LOW + COLLRATES(cm^3 s^-1) 1 2 1 1.2e-06 8.4e-07 5.3e-07 3.8e-07 2.1e-07 1.2e-07 8.6e-08 4.8e-08 3.7e-08 2 3 1 4.0e-07 2.8e-07 1.8e-07 1.3e-07 7.1e-08 4.0e-08 2.8e-08 1.2e-08 8.5e-09 3 4 1 2.9e-07 2.1e-07 1.3e-07 9.3e-08 5.2e-08 2.9e-08 2.1e-08 9.0e-09 6.3e-09 4 5 1 1.2e-07 8.5e-08 5.3e-08 3.8e-08 2.1e-08 1.2e-08 8.5e-09 3.8e-09 2.7e-09 5 3 2 2.7e-07 1.9e-07 1.2e-07 8.6e-08 4.9e-08 2.7e-08 1.9e-08 8.7e-09 6.1e-09 6 4 2 3.8e-07 2.7e-07 1.7e-07 1.2e-07 6.7e-08 3.8e-08 2.7e-08 1.2e-08 8.3e-09 7 5 2 5.5e-07 3.9e-07 2.5e-07 1.7e-07 9.8e-08 5.5e-08 3.9e-08 1.7e-08 1.2e-08 ! radiative transitions re-ordered, strictly by frequency ! -------------------- ! In older versions of the data file, the following C+ + H rates were used: ! COLLISIONS BETWEEN ! 5 C+ + H ! Launay & Roueff, 1977, JPB, 10, 879 ! NUMBER OF COLL TRANS ! 1 ! NUMBER OF COLL TEMPS ! 10 ! COLL TEMPS ! 5.0 10.0 20.0 50.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 500.0 1000.0 3162.0 ! TRANS + UP + LOW + COLLRATES(cm^3 s^-1) ! 1 2 1 5.9e-10 6.5e-10 7.0e-10 7.7e-10 8.1e-10 8.3e-10 8.5e-10 8.9e-10 9.8e-10 1.1e-09 ! These rates have been replaced by very similar values computed by Barinovs et al. 2005 ! In older versions of the data file, the following rates for C+ + pH2 and C+ + oH2 ! were used: !PARTNER 1 COLLISIONS BETWEEN !2 C+ + pH2 ! Flower & Launay (1977, JPB, 10, 3673); no corr. for Flower (1988) !NUMBER OF COLL TRANS !1 !NUMBER OF COLL TEMPS !6 !COLL TEMPS ! 10.0 20.0 50.0 100.0 200.0 250.0 !TRANS + UP + LOW + COLLRATES(cm^3 s^-1) ! 1 2 1 3.0e-10 3.4e-10 3.9e-10 4.3e-10 4.6e-10 4.7e-10 !PARTNER 2 COLLISIONS BETWEEN !3 C+ + oH2 ! Flower & Launay (1977, JPB, 10, 3673) !NUMBER OF COLL TRANS !1 !NUMBER OF COLL TEMPS !6 !COLL TEMPS ! 10.0 20.0 50.0 100.0 200.0 250.0 !TRANS + UP + LOW + COLLRATES(cm^3 s^-1) ! 1 2 1 4.4e-10 4.6e-10 4.9e-10 5.1e-10 5.6e-10 5.7e-10 ! -------------------- ! Updated 2014-08-08 for the new C+ + H2 rates computed by Lique et al. 2013 ! J. Chem. Phys. 138, 204314 and discussed further by Wiesenfeld & Goldsmith ! 2014, ApJ, 780, 183. Note that the new rates for para-H2 assume thermalized ! rotational populations in H2 and include H2(J=0) and (J=2).